Brokering Development - The Kenyan Greenport - INTI - International New Town Institute


| | | | | | | |


Brokering Development
- The Kenyan Greenport
article by Bas van den Hurk

In the world of international development cooperation an interesting dynamic is taking place: globalization. Neo-liberal ideologies give space for an expanded connectivity between policy making arenas and modes of policy development. The reduction of political boundaries is most evident within Dutch development cooperation. In recent years classic bi- and multilateral development aid was modernized by the introduction of extensive private sector subsidies, giving rise to new complex public-private partnerships. Within this ‘Aid to Trade’ discourse targeting market dynamics is argued to lead to more meaningful development than voluntary transfers of resources. Many have contested the shift from aid to trade, even though its intricate workings are not yet fully understood. In this short-read I present my experiences unpacking the ‘black box of development’ of the ‘Regional Agricultural and Industrial Network’ (RAIN) project in Nairobi, Kenya.

In 2015 DASUDA (Dutch Alliance Sustainable Urban Development Africa) partnered with RVO (the Netherlands Enterprise Agency) to initiate RAIN and received governmental funding to do so. RAIN is based upon the well-established Dutch Greenport concept: large and well-connected food production, processing and transportation hubs located in peri-urban areas (figure 1). In such hubs proximity is key to success since it creates numerous social, economical and environmental advantages compared to classic dispersed systems. From a more political perspective, the character of RAIN is two-faced: one aim is to stimulate structural cooperation between Dutch and Kenyan governments in perusing food security and the other aim is to propagate Dutch agri-business interests along the way. This notion of ‘win-win’ fits the bigger Aid-to-Trade concept seamlessly. The Dutch embassy in Kenya has food security at the top of its agenda and Dutch market actors have a strong competitive position in the agribusiness sector. It was for this reason that RAIN was admitted: it has great potential to create meaningful development whilst simultaneously opening-up new Dutch market opportunities.

Figure 1. RAIN concept. Source: DASUDA brochure 2015

Moving away from the vertical techno-political context we now focus on the more horizontal socio-geographical processes driving the development of RAIN. Policies, concepts and ideas cannot simply be traced from sites of origin to sites of implementation. In order to understand its trajectory we need to focus on the concepts of mobility and brokerage (figure 2). As already mentioned policies have become commodities on global markets. It is when a policy is actively transferred from originator to recipient that the fascinating concept of brokerage occurs. Brokerage entails the interactive processes of negotiation between key stakeholders aiming to tailor-fir foreign concepts to local conditions. Within this process ‘brokers’ play essential roles. They initiate the policy transfer process and manage the negotiations. Brokers seek to reach a mutual understanding of urgency by interlocking interests, but how do you reach consensus in a multi-stakeholder party with different and often contradicting institutional arrangements? For such activities no normative systems are in place, it’s an elaborate and delicate process of interaction ridden with uncertainty.

Figure 2. Relation between Policy Mobility and Brokerage. Source: van den Hurk, 2017

Brokering RAIN was a resource and time demanding process. Many unforeseen events and hurdles needed to be dealt with, many more then originally accounted for. A mismatch between project planning and actual implementation occurred challenging the development process and almost brought it to a complete halt. However two resourceful brokers, one from the RVO, Caroline Warmerdam, and the other from DASUDA, Remco Rolvink, overcame these problems. Acting as intermediaries between the very different worlds of Kenya and the Netherlands they have proven critical in the success of the project-planning phase. Next, three of the most critical hurdles to RAIN development, and how they were overcome, are discussed.

Figure 3. Real Urbanization map. Source: RVO GISCC, 2016

Shared understanding
Spatial developments require vast amounts of space. Before selecting a location political planning tools like zoning need to be in place to ensure sufficient available space from urban sprawl. However, local governments lacked a sense of urgency to the matter. In order to reach a shared understanding of its urgency brokers used GIS and Remote Sensing technologies to construct a strong visual representation of ‘Real Urbanization’ (figure 3). The map was received with astonishment and awe, resulting in a strong commitment to develop relevant planning tools not just for RAIN but for a stronger planning in general.

Commitment, accountability and ownership
The overal neglect of procedural commitment by local actors appeared a serious threat. Even after setting up strong rules of engagement, collectively set agendas, preparations and deadlines were ignored and timely attendances to meetings were exceptional. After reducing efforts for slacking actors together with increasing efforts for eager ones a competitive environment was created and accountability was enforced. Also, while the project matured its exposure increased, tapping into the pride of its stakeholders. These mechanisms fueled a will to be part of the project, a sense of ownership, and the commitment to actively engage and respect collective rules.

Figure 4. Collective mapping. DASUDA, 2015

Participation, engagement and data-interpretation
Local stakeholders lacked general planning expertise, disbalancing power-relations. In order to reach a more equal environment stakeholders needed to be engaged in planning related activities: ‘learning-by-doing’. Several interactive methods like brainstorming, roleplaying and collective mapping were applied (figure 4). Working together in fun and safe game-settings increased stakeholder participation engagement. Also, the importance of data collection and coordination became apparent. This led to an extension of the project, incorporating GIS workshops and follow-ups. Local stakeholders overcoming these issues by learning new skills is of mayor importance to reach trust and independence.

This short-read presents the intricate workings of Dutch privatized development cooperation by using RAIN as a case and brokerage as a lens. It shows how powerful and important actors can be in brokering development and how fluid, headstrong and open-minded they need to be to deliver. With this fundamental understanding first steps are made towards a more comprehensive understanding of privatized development cooperation. However, more comparable in-depth researches need to be conducted in order to normalize brokerage methodologies and improve its workings.








read other Short Reads
  • The Squatted New Town, Modern Movement meets Self-organisation in Venezuela
    - article by Simone Rots
  • Dalang Fever 3.
    Data to Control or to Empower?

    - article by Linda Vlassenrood
  • Utopian Radicalism - Providing radical alternatives to the ‘top-down’ planning of New Towns of the past.
    - Article by Sascha Herfkens
  • Brokering Development
    - The Kenyan Greenport

    - article by Bas van den Hurk
  • Shanzhai City
    What Will Make Shenzhen the Next Innovative City? - article by Tat Lam and Yeung Ho Man Legg
  • The New Urban Agenda –the Perspective of New Towns
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • Bottom-up is not enough
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • A City of Comings and Goings
    - Article by Wouter Vanstiphout and Michelle Provoost
  • Tema Manhean
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • When Smart Cities are Stupid
    - article by Rachel Keeton
  • Chinese urbanization through the lens of Da Lang
    - Article by Linda Vlassenrood
  • Making Housing Affordable in Fast-Growing Chinese Cities: A Shenzhen Perspective
    - article by Haotian Lin
  • The Dream of a Lifestyle: Master-Planned Communities and the New Tools of Exclusion
    ’New Towns & Politics’ - article by Tobias Armborst, Daniel D’Oca, Georgeen Theodore [INTERBORO]
  • The Politics of Planning: From Social Engineering to the Engineering of Consent Scenarios for Almere, Markerwaard, and New Netherlands 2050 (1965-1985)
    ’New Towns & Politics’ - article by Christian Salewski
  • The burden of being planned. How African cities can learn from experiments of the past: New Town Dodoma, Tanzania
    ’New Towns on the Cold War Frontier’ - article by Sophie van Ginneken
  • Exporting New Towns. The Welfare City in Africa
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • Transformation of Cape Town’s Informal Settlements: “The Pressure Cooker on the Boil”
    - article by Merve Bedir
  • Farming Chinese New Towns. Rethinking the roles of the agricultural landscape in new town development in China
    - article by Jiayao Liu
  • Living in Shenzhen: attractive for creatives?
    - Article by Marco Bontje
  • ’Van de idealen komt weinig meer terecht’
    Droomstreden - Article by Joris van Casteren
  • Real-world testing ground
    EU Export - article by Rachel Keeton
  • A Proposal for Inclusive Redevelopment in Shenzhen. Needed: An Intermediate Planning Tool
    - Article by Andrew Reynolds
  • The Openheid State. From closed to open society in Cape Town
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • Lost in translation
    New town narratives - column by Rachel Keeton
  • Albertslund; Berenklauwen in de tuin
    Droomstreden - Article by Joris van Casteren
  • Milton Keynes Calling
    New town narratives - column by Rachel Keeton
  • Slowing Down Shenzhen: An Inclusive Planning Approach to Regenerate the Homogeneous Industrial Areas of Shenzhen, China
    - Article by Maaike Zwart
  • To predict the future of technology, figure out how bureaucrats will use it.
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • Kaloleni: a Kenyan Garden City
    - article by Rachel Keeton
  • The miracle of Nowa Huta
    Imaginary cities / Droomsteden - Article by Joris van Casteren
  • Revived by historicization
    New town narratives - column by Rachel Keeton
  • Gropiusstadt; "Christiane F. woont hier niet meer"
    Droomsteden - Article by Joris van Casteren
  • DA LANG FEVER
    - Article by Linda Vlassenrood
  • I am Rosengård
    New town narratives - column by Rachel Keeton
  • Toulouse-Le Mirail; De voorstad brandt
    Droomsteden - Article by Joris van Casteren
  • In search of new values
    - Article by Michelle Provoost
  • A failed Communist utopia embraces its past – Nowa Huta
    New Town narratives - column by Rachel Keeton
  • Cumbernauld; Hollands Diep
    Droomsteden - Article by Joris van Casteren